Opinion on Logo usage?

[Ryan Rix]

On Mon 21 December 2009 11:40:54 pm Ian Weller wrote:
> > The code currently loads the png from
> > /usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png and generates the "Welcome to"
> > text from MgOpen Modata Bold in the same Panotone 2935 of the logo
> > typeface. If the logo typeface was made white, it would constitute
> > keeping a separate image in the Fedora-tour data directory or adding
> > another image to the fedora-logos package, I'd assume? The former is not
> > a Good Thing, and the latter would probably take some intervention with
> > Fedora-legal? I'm not sure of the details, tbh. What are everyone's
> > thoughts? Any workarounds come to mind?
> 
> Filing a bug against fedora-logos and attaching the proposed PNG with a
> rationale would probably do the trick.
> 

Cool beans; https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549628

Thanks Ian

-- 
Ryan Rix
Fedora KDE SIG Member, Phoenix AZ Ambassador, News KDE Beat writer

New Mail address: phrkonaleash at gmail.com -> ry at n.rix.si !!
http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://identi.ca/phrkonaleash
XMPP: phrkonaleash at gmail.com          | MSN: phrkonaleash at yahoo.com
AIM:  phrkonaleash                    | Yahoo: phrkonaleash
IRC:  PhrkOnLsh at irc.freenode.net/#srcedit,#plugaz,#fedora-kde and
      countless other FOSS channels.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20091222/86dfc22e/attachment.bin