Need FESCo vote ASAP

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Feb 3 02:18:33 UTC 2009


On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 07:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  Do we really need FESCo to micro manage this. FESCo has delegated this 
> job to rel-eng and they should able to trust rel-eng with making the 
> right decisions without voting on every small change in the schedule.

So you get upset when decisions are made in voice or IRC channels, so
when we try and make a decision in the open via mailing list and a
ticketing system, you say it's not necessary?  Really?  Can we win with
you Rahul?  Is it possible?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090202/3c844cb0/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list