Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9

Jakub Jelinek jakub at
Tue Feb 3 20:44:32 UTC 2009

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:37:35PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> > In the past few days I've done a mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126
> > in mock with gcc-4.4.0-0.9 (and corresponding libtool).
> > 6228 packages were successfully built, for the rest I've tried
> > to rebuild them also with gcc-4.3.2-7 (though I ran out of time,
> > so a couple of packages weren't attempted with 4.3).
> Thanks so much for doing this. I will collate this into
> gcc-4.4/porting_to.html for 4.4.0 unless you already have done so or
> plan to do so (let me know). Might as well get this stuff on the gcc

Feel free to do that.  Just probably leave out the main calling bit, I hope
Jason will make it -pedantic only soon.

> The extra warning is from -Wuninitialized, which is consistent with
> some of the gcc bugzilla traffic. I'm surprised you only got one: I
> expect you'll see more when you move to s390 and non-x86_64 arches.

To cause a package build failure the package has to use -Werror, most of the
packages don't.  But yes, I was surprised it was just one package, not 10 or


More information about the devel mailing list