Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for

[Jeff Spaleta]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> But several upstreams say they tried and it didn't change anything or even
> made things worse. And it'll be consuming more memory, both RAM and disk
> space. I'm not convinced it is a good idea.

Can you distill that down into a set of prioritized benchmarks. If
someone were going to play around with optimization switches. What are
the minimum matrix of obtainable benchmarks that such an effort would
have to meet in order to be considered a credible test?

-jef