getting kernel bug fix into a fedora kernel

[Sam Varshavchik]

Eric Sandeen writes:

> 
>> Skipping 2.6.28 for F8 and F9
>> 
>> Chuck Ebbert
>> Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:42:36 -0800
>> 
>> 2.6.28 has turned out to be a bit buggy. Also 2.6.27 has been chosen to be

Heh.

2.6.27 wasn't that great either. The very last 2.6.27 release, the 2.6.27.12 
build, was the first 2.6.27-series kernel that one of my servers could run, 
under load, without croaking. I still don't trust it, and I'll continue to 
bang at it. Until 2.6.27.12, I was forced to stay on 2.6.26, if I wanted to 
keep the server up.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090209/3a7ba4d9/attachment.bin