Heads up: Noarch Subpackages

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Sunday 15 February 2009 11:56:42 am Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Friday 13 February 2009, Florian Festi wrote:
> > I'll answer this in one mail each topic to avoid mixed up threads.
> >
> > Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > > What about F-10, and noarch-subpackage updates to packages that were
> > > all arch-specific before be shipped for it, or if this is F-11+ only? 
> > > This is obviously dependent on whether the needed infrastructure
> > > changes include support for doing this for F-10 as well, but I think
> > > it'd be nice to be explicit about it in case it'd be technically doable
> > > in the infrastructure but no go for some other reasons.
> >
> > As far as I understood there is only one koji instance for all releases
> > (will someone from the infrastructure team please correct me) and rpm 4.6
> > is in F10 for quite a while. So technical it should be possible to build
> > noarch sub packages in F10. Whether we want to change a lot of packages
> > in F10 for that is another question.
>
> FWIW, IMO it doesn't make sense to change /any/ packages in F-10 _for this
> feature only_.  What I meant was whether doing noarch subpackages while at
> it when pushing other usual F-10 updates would be ok.
Yes,  when they are supported by koji.  which will be after next weekend.  
Until then its not possible to build them.

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090215/f78cb736/attachment.bin