x86_32 yum $basearch

Josh Boyer jwboyer at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 18:57:38 UTC 2009


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:14:45AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 10:57 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37:13AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>> >On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 10:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >
>> >> Or you could just have:
>> >> 
>> >> x86
>> >> x86_64
>> >> ppc
>> >> ppc64
>> >> sparc
>> >> sparc64
>> >> 
>> >> etc.
>> >> 
>> >> Naming repos after specific arches just seems like pain.  This is
>> >> one area where ppc does things right.  You don't see things like:
>> >
>> >I wasn't naming them after specific  arches. I was saying  we can use
>> >symlinks to solve the arch complexity  and the confusion with what
>> >$basearch should be vs what pkgs are in the repo.
>> 
>> Ugh.
>> 
>
>I understand it is not the most attractive solution - but it felt like
>the best choice considering that it looks like we'll drop i586 entirely
>with F12. At least this way the i586 dir will vanish for F12 and there
>won't be any accidental upgrades.

I was Ughing at my complete lack of comprehension on what you were talking
about.  Not about your suggestion :).

As for i586 going away for F12, it may or it may not.  Doing this two
releases in a row still doesn't strike me as a great idea.  At the very
least it will need to be revisited by the FESCo that is in place for the
F12 cycle.

josh




More information about the devel mailing list