Referring to rpmfusion on Fedora project wiki?

[Michel Salim]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen
<bob at fedoraunity.org> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michel Salim" <michel.sylvan at gmail.com>
> To: "Fedora devel" <fedora-devel-list at redhat.com>, "RPM Fusion developers discussion list" <rpmfusion-developers at lists.rpmfusion.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 9:27:13 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Referring to rpmfusion on Fedora project wiki?
>
> The wiki page for Dell Inspiron Mini
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dell_Mini_Inspiron -- needs renaming)
> has instructions for installing the non-free Broadcom wi-fi drivers.
> These instructions are now superseded by the binary packages in
> rpmfusion-nonfree, and I'm wondering if in this case we can provide a
> link from the WIki to RPMfusion.
>
> If not, would we need a
> valid-everywhere-in-the-world-but-cannot-enter-Fedora category?
> Something like the Flash page that Warren used to mantain?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> miʃel salim  •  http://hircus.jaiku.com/
> IUCS         •  msalim at cs.indiana.edu
> Fedora       •  salimma at fedoraproject.org
> MacPorts     •  hircus at macports.org
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
> In the past this has been handled through third parties to allow Fedora/Red Hat deniablity. This is one of the purposes of http://fedorasolved.org/ or in the case of your topic, http://fedoramobile.org/
>
And presumably we can't really link to fedorasolved / fedoramobile
either? There ought to be a policy for editing Wikis so that we don't
cover things where the obvious solution cannot be mentioned.

Regards,

-- 
miʃel salim  •  http://hircus.jaiku.com/
IUCS         •  msalim at cs.indiana.edu
Fedora       •  salimma at fedoraproject.org
MacPorts     •  hircus at macports.org