Ready for new RPM version?

[Tom Lane]

seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Since F-9 is still supported, isn't it a management failing to have
>> allowed this to happen without a plan to make mock on F-9 work?

> Then you're wrong:
> yum update rpm\* yum\*
> that should be about it.

Oh?

[tgl at rh2 ~]$ sudo yum update rpm\* yum\*
...
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update
[tgl at rh2 ~]$ 

What was stated a couple days ago was that back-porting the hash changes
into pre-F10 RPM versions was completely impractical.  Has that been
rethought?

			regards, tom lane