improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10

[Ricardo Argüello]

I reported it as a bug:

Add improve-relatime.patch to F10 and rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479052

-- 
Ricardo Arguello

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ricardo Argüello
<ricardo at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Should I report the dropped improve-relatime.patch as a bug? The
> mkinitrd is a whole different thing.
>
> What I wanted was the improve-relatime.patch to be included in F10, as
> it is included in F9 by default:
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/relatime-patches/improve-relatime.patch
>
> --
> Ricardo Arguello
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Woehlke
> <mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> Ricardo Argüello wrote:
>>>
>>> Why was the improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10's kernel? F9 had
>>> relatime on by default using this patch.
>>> I first thought the upstream kernel had the patch now, but
>>> /proc/mounts does not show relatime in F10.
>>>
>>> I found this bug, looks related:
>>>
>>>  mkinitrd can't deal with the "relatime" mount option
>>>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430280
>>
>> Speaking of, this looks to be... how old? Any chance of getting it fixed?
>> (Especially with SSD's becoming more popular, for which it makes particular
>> sense to request relatime?)
>>
>> I mean... if you don't know about this bug and add relatime to fstab, you've
>> just made it impossible to upgrade the kernel. And the work-around (edit
>> fstab to remove relatime, 'yum update kernel', edit fstab to put back
>> relatime) isn't very friendly.
>>
>> --
>> Matthew
>> Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
>> --
>> "Ethics? We've heard of it" -- Microsoft
>>
>> --
>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>