TeX font package naming guidelines
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Wed Jan 14 18:06:09 UTC 2009
Le mercredi 14 janvier 2009 à 14:02 -0300, Horst H. von Brand a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > ctan-some-package-fonts-common
> > ctan-some-package-roman-fonts
> >
> > according to the draft for the fonts part.
>
> Sounds wrong... either all fonts-foo or all bar-fonts, not mix and
> match. Please?
The -fonts packages are real font packages
The srpm-common is an utility package with no fonts inside (common stuff
like directory ownership, documentation, etc), so it's actually good it
has a different naming than packages with fonts in them.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090114/5e13969c/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list