NVR bugs in rawhide
mschwendt at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 16:14:10 UTC 2009
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:54:10 +0200, Ralf wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:01:50 +0200, Ralf wrote:
> >>> You don't need to drop %dist for koji build inheritance to work.
> >>> It just looks much cleaner to inherit foo-1.0-1.noarch.rpm for all
> >>> newer targets
> >> IFF "current rpm" is sufficiently compatible to the antique version of
> >> rpm a package has been built on.
> >> If this doesn't apply you don't get anywhere.
> > Not _with_ %dist either.
> Of cause it would help. A package's release tag would very verbosely
> tell you that a package is outdated.
And still it would fail if RPM were changed [the way you describe] while
%dist stayed the same. %dist doesn't reflect at all whether RPM changes
its file format near the beginning of a Fedora devel cycle.
> >> => I agree with Jussi. Allowing people not to use %dist is not helpful.
> >> It's a booby trap which certainly will hit some day.
> > %dist is a trap itself - packagers run into it regularly, e.g. when
> > adding Obsoletes and versioned dependencies, when doing trial-and-error
> > fixing of old branches (without paying attention to the recommendations in
> > the guidelines), when committing and tagging after a server-side update of
> > the "branches" file.
> Quite easy to overcome: always use %?dist.
Doesn't help much. Packager still needs to bump all branches [correctly]
> It's the cases when people add/remove %?dist, which are problematic.
Going in circles won't be of any use in this thread. Using %dist adds
complications, too. Or else packagers would not run into some of the
pitfalls I've pointed out.
More information about the devel