Some pulseaudio questions...

[Jon Masters]

On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 19:01 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:51:02AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > What would be good to have would be a "swap niceness" value that could
> > be attached to a processes or memory regions. i.e. some way to
> > influence the swapping algorithm in a less binary way than just "swap
> > this" or "don't swap this".

> I've been working on this along with some enhancements to make fadvise
> more than utterly useless... hopefully will be ready for posting soon.

Main problem is proving its utility with actual benchmarks - witness the
recent first class citizen VM patch thread.

Jon.