rpms/polkit-gnome/devel polkit-gnome.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Jun 9 21:10:16 UTC 2009
- Previous message: rpms/polkit-gnome/devel polkit-gnome.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message: rpms/polkit-gnome/devel polkit-gnome.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Le mardi 09 juin 2009 à 10:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:06 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > My anger is because people don't honor our packaging guidelines not even
> > if they are asked to do so. The guidelines are very clear in this case:
> > "Multiple packages have files in a common directory but none of them
> > requires others. [...] In this case, each package must own
> > the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory."
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
>
> Well, part of the problem is that the review guidelines strike a very
> different tone:
Just create a gnome-filesystem package that owns your common directories
and be done with it. rpm requires something to own dirs but you're the
packagers decide what this something is
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090609/7da83e83/attachment.bin
- Previous message: rpms/polkit-gnome/devel polkit-gnome.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message: rpms/polkit-gnome/devel polkit-gnome.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the devel
mailing list