GRUB 2 in Ubuntu 9.10

[Matthias Clasen]

On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:

> If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub 
> "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I 
> fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took 
> ownership and vendors carried their own individual patches wich doesn't 
> really work well with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.

For better or worse, we are effectively running a grub fork, and I see
very little desire to change that...