Fedora LaTeX SIG?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
> >>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> writes:
> 
> NM> I didn't see this before but I can only agree with the replies:
> NM> this is an insane plan. Nobody is ever going to review properly a
> NM> 2.7 MiB spec file, updating will be hell, etc.
> 
> Isn't it nice, then that the final plan is different from the
> initially proposed one?  I see that you read the thread, so why bother
> commenting on something that's not currently being proposed?

I didn't notice at first that archive threading was broken and that you
had bits of the thread right and left. Also, I didn't see any clear
final plan in the list archives

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090611/e81e69e8/attachment.bin