Why a multilib wrapper for non-multilib architectures?!
Eric Sandeen
sandeen at redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 03:47:53 UTC 2009
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Personally I don't use multilib wrappers on arches that don't need it;
>> I think not needing extra cases in the wrapper header outweighs the
>> added complexity in the specfile. But I'm not going to tell the gmp
>> maintainer he's wrong for doing it the other way.
>
> +1
>
> -- Rex
Heh, so I have it both ways in my packages, xfsprogs does it only for
(hand-defined) %{multilib_arches}, e2fsprogs does it for all, inherited
via cut and paste.
If someone who cared provided some nice rpm macros to work with, perhaps
we'd easily have the best of both worlds. :)
-Eric
More information about the devel
mailing list