Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 06/22/2009 05:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

>> Isn't the scripts Michael Schwendt refers to, not useful anymore? Even
> 
> It's useful.  It's generally after the fact though, and in the long run I think
> we want to be proactive, not reactive.

I agree but we aren't even reacting much now. If the scripts run from
infrastructure systems automatically as opposed to having someone run it
manually, I suspect it would help fix most of the issues we are
currently having.

Rahul