FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

[Guido Grazioli]

That kind of metrics mean absolutely *nothing*

2009/6/29 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at>

> I wrote:
> > At the rate of one update per month to every GNOME package?
>
> PS: Some stats:
> Over the lifetime of F9 (which is now almost over, that's why I picked F9):
> * libgnome was not updated a single time (!) (it was updated a single time
> in F10 with 2 packaging-only changes, but never in F9).
> * kdelibs was updated 18 times, the last time was 2009-06-19.
> Another example (still F9):
> * evince got updated a single time on 2008-06-10 (to a bugfix release).
> * kdegraphics got updated 13 times, last on 2009-06-19, several of those
> updates fixed bugs, added features and/or updated translations (in matching
> kde-l10n updates) for Okular (the KDE equivalent of Evince), though I don't
> have the exact number (due to how KDE is distributed by upstream).
>
> I'll stop here because I think you got the point. The stats for F10 and F11
> so far don't look much better for GNOME, and I don't think I picked the
> wrong packages for a comparison. (If you think I did, feel free to suggest
> others.)
>
>        Kevin Kofler
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



-- 
Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli at gmail.com>
Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA)
Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18)
Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337  DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278
Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090629/e85db2e5/attachment.html