FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Mon Jun 29 14:54:31 UTC 2009
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/28/2009 10:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> Rahul, I question the point of ... making laundry lists of pros, cons,
>> bugs
>> of desktop X vs Y... I'm sure folks can come up with a similar list of
>> gnome (or other) related negative items, or kde-only features too but I
>> question it's constructiveness.
>
> The constructiveness if for KDE SIG and individuals to accept...
I am not going there... la la la.
>> 2. A bigger question to me is what does it mean to be the "default"
>> desktop. All this "it's the default because..." comments make me wonder
>> if
>> folks are just grasping for reasons to justify the status quo. Where or
>> how
>> is this documented anywhere? If it isn't, shouldn't it be?
>
> Why single out desktop environments? Is the justifications for all of
> our defaults documented anywhere? Shouldn't it be?
Indeed, amen brother, but you've gotta start somewhere.
-- Rex
More information about the devel
mailing list