FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

[Bill Nottingham]

Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler at chello.at) said: 
> Chris Adams wrote:
> > ISTR FESCo voted that down.
> 
> They voted it down based on false assumptions, such as the one from Bill
> Nottingham (the one that it doesn't make any actual difference,

You know, I realize we may not agree. But I'd appreciate it if you didn't
put words in my mouth. If you'll see the log:

17:33:02 <notting> "The current naming misleads users into either thinking
GNOME is the only available desktop environment in Fedora or thinking the
image also provides the other options." <- i don't really think either of
these are accurate
17:33:26 <notting> skvidal: the download page already says 'featuring the
gnome desktop'

(The quoted part is your rationale from the ticket). My only other comments
on the subject were questioning why you waited until you joined FESCo to
propose this, when it didn't require that at all, and a comment that the
discussion was going in circles, which it was.

But hey, thanks for the unfounded assertion that everyone who voted against
it was operating under false assumptions, and they could not possibly have
any rational reasons for disagreeing with you.

Bill