an update to automake-1.11?

[Sam Varshavchik]

Kevin Kofler writes:

> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> This is seriously dubious for F9, since if it causes a problem there
>> is next to no time in which to fix it before F9 updates are turned
>> off.  In general I struggle to believe that there is a compelling
>> need to rebase automake versions in our stable releases.
> 
> Some software may need the new version to build.

Then, they need to be patched so that they would get built for F9, or they 
should not be built for F9 altogether.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090630/e9211a58/attachment.bin