%config files and upgrade to F11 - consider noreplace
Horst H. von Brand
vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl
Mon Mar 2 13:22:29 UTC 2009
Bill Crawford <billcrawford1970 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 13:01:07 Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Bill Crawford píše v Čt 26. 02. 2009 v 11:55 +0000:
> ...
> > > ... and run the old checksum code on the file
> > > on the machine, before replacing it with the new file and the new hash.
> >
> > That answers the question whether the user has modified the file. It
> > doesn't answer the question whether the packager has modified the
> > shipped file between the two rpm package versions.
>
> But that's the question we should be asking ... right?
No.
There are 3 potential files involved:
A: The original configuration as given by the installed package
B: The installed configuration file (as modified by the user)
C: The new configuration file.
If B == A, rpm can safely replace the configuration file by C.
If A != B, the user changed something, and the changes have to be ported
forward by hand.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513
More information about the devel
mailing list