packaging libraries with no versioned .so files
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Fri Mar 20 18:19:07 UTC 2009
On Do März 19 2009, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> The guidelines don't appear to cover the case of packages that only
> consist of unversioned .so's. Ideally upstream would add the
The Review Guidelines are easier to understand:
| MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
| libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go
| in a -devel package.
Imho this means, that the .so files without other suffixed .so.* files go in
the main package.
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090320/09b48a3c/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list