getting rid of gcc34

Denis Leroy denis at poolshark.org
Sat Mar 21 19:57:29 UTC 2009


Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Denis Leroy wrote:
>> Please no, these older versions of gcc are extremely useful to C++
>> programmers. The differences between one version of gcc to the other
>> often have a significant impact over C++ code compatibility (much more
>> so than for C). I spent a lot of time trying to fix a K-3D build issue
>> related to the C++ boost library unhappy with g++ 4.4. It was very
>> useful to have g++34 available to fall back on a working case.
> 
> What's the status of that? It's one of the remaining broken dependencies in
> the F11 beta.

It's a particularly tough C++ compilation issue, I could use some help 
if anyone is familiar with C++ template meta-programming (Boost MPL). 
K-3D ships its own version of the Boost GIL library (Image library). 
It's fairly straightforward to patch the source to use the Boost GIL 
library we ship with F-11, but unfortunately it doesn't fix the problem.

Looking at the g++ changelog from 4.3 to 4.4, I don't see anything that 
could explain this problem (code compiles fine with 4.3).

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=93629

See also:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491322

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=49B7887D.8020502%40poolshark.org&forum_name=k3d-development




More information about the devel mailing list