Breaking deps deliberately
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Wed May 13 15:30:14 UTC 2009
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:49:59PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> "* The distribution SHOULD not contain any broken EVR paths (i.e.
> packages that RPM considers "older" than those in the previous release).
> * The distribution SHOULD not contain any broken dependencies."
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/ReleaseCriteria#Package_Sanity
Yeah, that's not a packaging guideline though is it. That's a set of
release criteria that the QA team use.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw
More information about the devel
mailing list