Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Btw, the F-10 update would have had a higher %release than the F-11
> update (1.0.21-4.fc10 > 1.0.21-3.fc11).
Sigh, why do people keep doing this instead of using proper 3.fc10.1
versioning? Deliberate breaking of upgrade paths also needs to be banned!
Kevin Kofler