Package Maintainers Flags policy
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue May 19 21:36:05 UTC 2009
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I agree with this sentiment 100%. We're here to make better packages,
> not whine about how making better packages is hard. However, I'd point
> out that in this specifc case Jesse raised the "easier" argument and
> Till was just replying to that.
I think that my point was that it is an easier to understand policy. It
may be more difficult to enact, but it is a far sight easier than trying
to figure out what other packages might require your flags, and if any
of those packages are on something called a "default spin", which can
change it's contents at any time.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090519/5a0a4778/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list