gnaughty is a hot babe

Florian Festi ffesti at redhat.com
Fri May 29 16:02:18 UTC 2009


inode0 wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Florian Festi <ffesti at redhat.com> wrote:
>> inode0 wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das <kushaldas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
>>>>> different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
>>>>> allow the inclusion of useless code?
>>>> Which is useless to me can be very useful to someone else.
>>> That doesn't explain why there is a different standard for content.
>> It is ok if you know and obey the rules. There is no need for you to
>> understand why they are in place. Anyway, Fedora is a Linux distribution
>> (for those who did not yet realize) an though (free) Linux software (that
>> can be run on Fedora) is what it is all about and content is not (with very
>> few exceptions). Software yes - content no. I really see no way or reason
>> why there should be a common standard for both.
> 
> "To lead the advancement of free and open source software and content
> as a collaborative community."
> 
> That is the mission statement of what project?

The Fedora Project with is close but not exactly the same as the Fedora 
Linux distribution. If you want to do more for free and open content start a 
new sub project or join one of the sub projects that already work on content 
(like "Fedora Documentation" or "Fedora Artwork")

Florian




More information about the devel mailing list