gnaughty is a hot babe

[Seth Vidal]

On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:50 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> It is not Fedora's place to police *usage* of apps, only whether the
>> app
>> or package has a compliant license and follows the defined packaging &
>> legal rules. If the tool were directly containing support for decoding
>> such prorietry formats that would be a different matter, because the
>> codecs would not pass the legal rules.
>>
>
> Then do you find it OK to package up a bunch of packages that provide
> nothing but gnome or KDE menu entries that launch porn internet sites?
> What about packages that add bookmarks for these in Firefox
> (disregarding the fact that Firefox can only have one bookmarks package
> at this point)?  Technically it's "free software", could be packaged
> within the guidelines, and wouldn't be illegal on the surface, but is
> this really acceptable things to distribute under the Fedora brand?
>

and I think the distinction being made is that the bookmarks and menu 
items are content-only, not software.

-sv