Broken dependencies script at it again

[Sam Varshavchik]

Tom Lane writes:

> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> writes:
>> Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
>> altogether?  or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
>> breaks?
> 
> I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
> that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package

Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken 
dependencies.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20091114/4cb48605/attachment.bin