Broken deps for rawhide the past few days

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:12 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> said:
> > Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding
> > broken deps in rawhide.  If these emails mentioned that the deps were
> > broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored.  We are no longer producing
> > ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however we forgot to tag the config change
> > that enacted this on our compose tools.  We were attempting to compose
> > ppc(64) trees with only noarch packages, and well things didn't work so
> > hot.
> 
> As a mirror admin: what does this mean for .../development/ppc{,64}?
> Will they go away at some point?  If so, when?
> 

They will go away as of tonight I do believe.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20091116/8c6f7a16/attachment.bin