Fedora with Universal Binaries?

King InuYasha ngompa13 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 19:02:59 UTC 2009

Well, possibly the only thing fatELF would be needed for would be to rid
ourselves of multilib. Applications don't even need to be FatELF to link to
FatELF libraries.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Ikem Krueger
<ikem.krueger at googlemail.com>wrote:

> > I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style
> > binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to watch,
> so
> > that Fedora could integrate both x86-32 and x86-64 into single DVD sets.
> I don't suggest to do that. As already mentioned, that would double
> the size of the distro/iso. I would use this technic only, if
> neccessary.
> About "fat-elf" in general: As long as it is optional, I am fine with
> it. May it at compile time or after compiling by stripping binaries.
> (I'd like to see both options.)
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20091026/b23607e1/attachment.html 

More information about the devel mailing list