another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

Jindrich Novy jnovy at redhat.com
Tue Sep 8 10:31:32 UTC 2009


On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:10:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
> > proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
> > in the testing repository:
> 
> OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with 
> the exception of some quirks already reported in this list). Unfortunately in 
> the end I had a non working latex.

It was likely caused by the missing texlive-latex provides. It should
be fixed with the current package set.

> 
> Making this story short for some reason texlive-latex was not installed when I 
> had update the system. Installing it fixed the problem. Does it make sense to 
> have the latex packages depending on this?

The main "texlive" package now contains a dependency to
texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be
pulled in automatically when just installing "texlive".

Jindrich

> 
> > Thanks,
> > Jindrich
> 
> Thanks for the hard, :-)
> 
> -- 
> José Abílio
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy <jnovy at redhat.com>   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/




More information about the devel mailing list