Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski

Tom Lane tgl at redhat.com
Sun Sep 13 01:49:34 UTC 2009


Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> writes:
> IMHO, a consecutive week or longer without being online (there are usually 
> ways to check your mail when on vacation, if not, see the next point) and 
> with no preannouncement (that's what the Vacation page in the wiki is for!) 
> is enough to constitute non-responsiveness on its own

You *seriously* need to get a life.  The above sort of standard might be
reasonable for people who were getting paid to do Fedora packaging, but
a large fraction of Fedora packagers aren't.

(Not that kurzawa doesn't seem to be well past the threshold of
reasonable responsiveness.  But people are allowed to take two-week
vacations without having to answer to FESCO for it.)

			regards, tom lane




More information about the devel mailing list