GNU libc confusion with symbols undefined.

Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at
Fri Sep 18 18:03:59 UTC 2009


Brown, Rodrick  wrote:
> Dave so essentially @@GLIBC_2.2.5 is the symbol version set this release
> is based on? Not necessarily having anything to do with the underlying RPM
> package version? This is what I'm getting from your explanation.

Those symbols have not changed since version 2.2.5, so the symbol version is 
still 2.2.5.

        Kevin Kofler




More information about the devel mailing list