Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 12:03 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> 
> > Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
> 
> Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
> for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach.  There are probably a
> good many packagers that don't check in once a week or more.  Not the
> case for you or I obviously, but I wouldn't discount that they exist.
> 
> There have been times when I'm on vacation in the middle of nowhere
> and couldn't get Internet, etc.  Do I have to orphan all my packages
> when I'm planning on being on vacation for two weeks? There are also
> times when I can get Internet but would prefer not to, etc.
> 
> Jon "writing this at 38,000 feet on the way to SFO" Stanley

In all fairness, that is not what Kevin suggested. He suggested that
maintainers who are absent for two weeks (not one) *without providing
notification before they left* should be considered non-responsive.
That's a significant difference.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net