sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Mon Apr 5 11:17:25 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/02/2010 11:44 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:34:31 -0600
> Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> 
>> This more of things disappearing from updates-testing before
>> appearing in the main F13 repo?  Multi-lib issue?
> 
> Only sssd-client should be multilib, and it does not require the other
> libs.
> 
>> I suppose yum might want to complain that sssd wants an earlier
>> version than that already installed rather than trying to grab the
>> i686 version.
> 
> Right, this is an issue.
> I will apply a fix to the spec an rebuild.
> 
> Simo.
> 

Sorry about that, folks. In order to ensure that the latest versions of
the required subpackages are installed, I have an explicit Requires: on
the %{version}-{release} of the subpackages. This broke when I reset the
%{release} to 1 following a new %{version} bump.

Simo, thank you for pushing a fix. It's available in updates-testing
now. Karma appreciated.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAku5xsUACgkQeiVVYja6o6PsnACdHXGPqlfJXItbXDwPPWCcsLBX
jw8An04eRyrj3l7VPyLdK9f0IRBHVwSv
=1+B9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the devel mailing list