PolicyKit-authentication-agents in Fedora
christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Thu Apr 8 23:53:21 UTC 2010
Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 19:05 -0400 schrieb Tony Nelson:
> On 10-04-08 14:13:01, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > I never said it is a useful decision rationale, it's something we
> > cannot avoid. I agree it's not useful, but please address your
> > complainants to the yum developers.
> Would it work to change the name to "polkit-lxpolkit" and have it
> Provide lxpolkit?
Then polkit-kde would win and it has even more deps. ;)
Not sure if we should change the name from what upstream uses. IMO first
of all yum's depsolver should be enhanced. Matthias already made an
important point here.
P.S. /me wonders what would happen if we had polkit-gtk and polkit-kde
with the same provides and the same length of the name..
More information about the devel