PolicyKit-authentication-agents in Fedora

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Thu Apr 8 23:53:21 UTC 2010

Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 19:05 -0400 schrieb Tony Nelson:
> On 10-04-08 14:13:01, Christoph Wickert wrote:


> > I never said it is a useful decision rationale, it's something we
> > cannot avoid. I agree it's not useful, but please address your 
> > complainants to the yum developers.
>  ...
> Would it work to change the name to "polkit-lxpolkit" and have it 
> Provide lxpolkit?

Then polkit-kde would win and it has even more deps. ;)

Not sure if we should change the name from what upstream uses. IMO first
of all yum's depsolver should be enhanced. Matthias already made an
important point here.


P.S. /me wonders what would happen if we had polkit-gtk and polkit-kde
with the same provides and the same length of the name..

More information about the devel mailing list