potentially unmaintained packages

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Apr 14 16:44:04 UTC 2010

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 17:03 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
> > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potentially-unmaintained/2010-04-13/
> I see packages_by_user, pkgs_with_bugs and everything. What I would like
> to see is pkgs_with_bugs_by_user, because this is something that should
> really considered harmful. If a package has no bugs, I don't think it
> needs a new build.
Reading this made me think that this would be a great thing to expose
continuously, for instance on this packagedb page:


Querying bugzilla is a comparatively expensive process so it's probably
something we need to do by syncing the count of bugs into the db via a cron
job.  Any takers?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100414/80a5028e/attachment.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list