potentially unmaintained packages

Seth Vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Wed Apr 14 18:34:54 UTC 2010



On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:01:01 -0700, Adam wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that Seth quite carefully wrote his email specifically to
>> forestall replies of this kind. Apparently it wasn't enough...
>
> Of course not. The subject says "potentially unmaintained packages".
> The message makes a fuss about it, even mentions scenarios like retiring
> packages. What it doesn't comment on is that despite missing rebuilds,
> a package may still be maintained both in Fedora and upstream. It doesn't
> mention other potentially unmaintained packages which are missing on
> the list because they have seen rebuilds (even if just for spec
> modifications), but which are dead upstream and unmaintained in Fedora.

seriously? I don't think I ever said the list was all inclusive.

-sv



More information about the devel mailing list