Can I have some documentation examples excluded from Abrt crash collection?
bochecha at fedoraproject.org
Wed Apr 14 20:02:18 UTC 2010
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 21:53, Karel Klic <kklic at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Good idea, also the opencv package would use this feature for its Python
> programming examples. Current ABRT cannot ignore crashes based on paths,
> so it must be developed.
> Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking
> the files you want to exclude. I think it will be something like:
> IMHO for the beginning it is right to have even package-specific
> configuration (like the excluded paths) in ABRT. Later this kind of
> configuration should move to the packages, as ABRT configuration files
> and feature set become more mature and stable.
I'm not sure if that could be used for my own issues with ABRT, but
let me explain it.
When I'm developing a TG2 application, I sometimes get a traceback
(well, I'm not perfect :). ABRT sees the traceback, and wants me to
report a bug against Paster.
However, the bug is not in Paster, it's in my own code, and I know it
since I'm currently developing it (Paster is used to launch TG2
Would it be possible to ignore this kind of tracebacks while not
ignoring legit Paster issues?
More information about the devel