potentially unmaintained packages

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 15 20:55:26 UTC 2010


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> > seriously? I don't think I ever said the list was all inclusive.
>> And in my original reply I only asked some questions related to
>> packages being considered "potentially unmaintained".
>
> Is there a secret definition of "potentially" which I am unaware of and
> which is causing grief here?

This is the fedora-devel-list .... do I really need to add anything else? ;)


More information about the devel mailing list