Request for Comments: Fedora Project Contributor Agreement Draft (Replacement for Fedora Individual Contributor License Agreement)

[Matt McCutchen]

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:15 -0500, charles zeitler wrote:
> i looked at this (and the MIT license) didn't see any explicit reference
> to source code! (e.g. , that it must be made available.)

Indeed.  For an MIT licensing regime to be considered "free", the
original author must provide the source.  But being non-copyleft, the
license does not require distributors of derived works to provide
source.

I can't imagine Fedora accepting a contribution in binary form, so I
believe this is a non-issue.

-- 
Matt