Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

[Nathanael Noblet]

On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 03:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 
>>> And even if the Fedora Thunderbird maintainer decides to push a
>>> patched package to F-12, there's no way it should be pushed directly
>>> to stable.
>> 
>> Why not, if it contains an important fix?
> 
> Because if we don't test the updated package we don't know:
> 
> a) does it actually fix the bug?
> b) does it break anything else?
> 
> Just because an update 'contains an important fix' doesn't mean it's
> fine to release it without testing.

I'll test it. I don't need it in stable right away...