Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available
rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Apr 26 13:35:04 UTC 2010
On 04/26/2010 10:52 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 02:11 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Well, may-be FESCO should decide upon on whether the FSF's
>> "freedom 3"  is a inclusion/exclusion criterion for packages in Fedora.
>>  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
> It is (except for firmware)
... and on Fedora's own trademark encumbered packages.
> but before you wave it around, you will do
> well to ask FSF whether the Mozilla trademark guidelines violate it.
I know - I had a discussion with a FSF-representative on this.
But ... many people disagree with this.
As well as the facts speak for themselves:
* The Fedora Mozilla packages can't be bug-fixed/patched.
Cause: The package is non-free.
* The Fedora Mozilla package can't be made compliant to the FPG.
Cause the packages are non-free.
Openly speaking, I feel RH is not interested addressing this issues,
likely for political reasons or for marketing reason - A too high price
to pay, if you ask me.
> understanding is that, they don't consider it a violation and yes, I
> have actually asked them.
Well, Mozilla license definitely is an open-source license.
It's just that the Mozilla packages in Fedora are non-free.
More information about the devel