Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available
metherid at gmail.com
Mon Apr 26 13:54:17 UTC 2010
On 04/26/2010 07:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 10:52 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 04/26/2010 02:11 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> Well, may-be FESCO should decide upon on whether the FSF's
>>> "freedom 3"  is a inclusion/exclusion criterion for packages in
>>>  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
>> It is (except for firmware)
> ... and on Fedora's own trademark encumbered packages.
No. Only firmware. Fedora's trademarks are not a problem at all.
> Well, Mozilla license definitely is an open-source license.
> It's just that the Mozilla packages in Fedora are non-free.
How? Your claim here is certainly not supported by the FSF. although
they have some issues with the recommendation of non-free plugins and if
you consider it a legal question, it is outside the scope of FESCo.
FESCo can still discuss it from a policy perspective but then pointing
to FSF guidelines confuses a policy discussion with a legal one.
More information about the devel