Add mercurial to development group?
rc040203 at freenet.de
Thu Apr 29 07:07:50 UTC 2010
On 04/28/2010 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Rex Dieter (rdieter at math.unl.edu) said:
>>> fyi, comps is in git now, instructions are referenced in the
>>> aforementioned document.
>> ... and mercurial's already an optional package there. Or is this
>> a request to make it a default one?
> IMO, mercurial should have the same status as git. git is default. Should
> we take a vote?
Make both optional.
Devs should know what they need, so there should not be any need to make
any of them default.
More information about the devel