Add mercurial to development group?

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at
Thu Apr 29 07:07:50 UTC 2010

On 04/28/2010 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Rex Dieter (rdieter at said:
>>> fyi, comps is in git now, instructions are referenced in the
>>> aforementioned document.
>> ... and mercurial's already an optional package there. Or is this
>> a request to make it a default one?
>> Bill
> IMO, mercurial should have the same status as git.  git is default.  Should
> we take a vote?

Make both optional.

Devs should know what they need, so there should not be any need to make 
any of them default.


More information about the devel mailing list