Fedora 14 Alpha Can Still Ship on Time IF these bugs get attention TODAY

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Aug 6 01:11:29 UTC 2010


On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 14:55 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:46 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Tom "spot" Callaway said the following on 08/05/2010 10:08 AM Pacific Time:
> > > On 08/05/2010 12:59 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> > >> 597858 [NEW - high - dwalsh at redhat.com - --- -] "SELinux is preventing
> > >> firefox from making its memory writable and executable." crashes rawhide
> > >> firefox start
> > >
> > > The update to fix this one out is here:
> > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.8.8-10.fc14
> > >
> > > ~spot
> > 
> > That's excellent information to put in the bug.
> 
> Bodhi does this automatically if you add the bug number to the update
> when you create it [1]; not sure if it does it when adding a bug to an
> already-created update.
> 
> In my mind, bodhi ought to moved NEW and ASSIGNED bugs to MODIFIED when
> an update is created that references them, to signify that a build is
> available for testing, but is not yet known to fix the bug.  However it
> doesn't seem to do this.  Is this a policy decision in Fedora's bug
> workflow, or merely an RFE I need to file against Bodhi?

IIRC, it sets ON_QA when the update is *pushed* to -testing - not when
it's *submitted*.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list