Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-08-10)

Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com
Wed Aug 11 13:38:02 UTC 2010


On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:54 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:03:07 -0400, Bill wrote:
> > Just saying that the person to commit the fixes found in the review
> > should (IMO) not be the reviewer themselves, even if they happen to
> > be a provenpackager. It allows for a having a second set of eyes on the
> > changes in the case where the maintainer may not have responded.
> 
> It would have been an excellent opportunity for provenpackagers, who do
> Merge Reviews, to gain confidence in touching others' packages, but
> FESCo's anxiousness ruines it. The maintainer(s) would be the second
> pair of eyes. Don't forget the commit diff notification. They could
> object to commits they don't disagree with.

With either my provenpackager or my fesco hat on: yeah, I agree with
Michael.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100811/2c6f7380/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list